Skip to content

Legal, but is it Just?

December 6, 2013

Over at Popehat, Ken White is talking about a shooting by the NYPD where the man who was being shot at is currently under indictment for the fact that the NYPD hit two bystanders.

 

Unfortunately, that may very well be legal. The doctrine that a criminal bears responsibility for actions arising from his or her crime is very well established in American law. In other words, if a man takes a hostage and that hostage later dies in a shootout, the kidnapper bears the blame. He, after all, created the situation in which the hostage was put at risk.

So legally, it’s likely that Mr. Broadnax may be out of luck, although we’ll have to wait and see what the jury thinks.

But in this case, there are two other factors at play. The first is the question of whether or not Mr. Broadnax understood what was happening. He was suffering from mental illness at the time, and thus may not have been in control of his actions. He certainly wasn’t attempting to kidnap or harm anyone else. Due to the collapse of America’s mental healthcare networks, this is a problem that most police departments face, and unfortunately, in all too many cases, encounters with the mentally ill end in tragedy.

More importantly, there is the question of the fact that it was the police who shot the two bystanders. The NYPD has not exactly covered itself in glory when it comes to controlled gunfire in crowded areas.  Is Mr. Broadnax at fault if the police failed to follow proper procedure? That’s a dangerous precedent, for the simple reason that if the solution to bad police marksmanship becomes to simply charge the suspect—expect far more bad police marksmanship.

As has been said, legally this decision may stand on firm ground. But in terms of whether or not it is fair, just or even good policy, the issue is far murkier. If this case goes to trial it is likely that Mr. Broadnax’s defense attorney is going to play that component of the case for all its worth.

 

Advertisements

From → Police, Politics

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Make A Living Writing

The political thought of Charles Gray

Why? Because Science.

Combating Stupidity Since 2012

Psyche's Circuitry

Thoughts on growing up and growing old in the digital age

Future Tense

The political thought of Charles Gray

Viv Drewa - The Owl Lady

PA/PR, Indie Author and Blogger

chrismcmullen

Writing, Publishing, and Marketing Ideas

Artistry With Words

Helping writers to spread their wings and fly

Random Thoughts

from a stranger in a strange land.

bottledworder

easy reading is damn hard writing

CONTRARY BRIN

Speculations on the Future: Science, Technology and Society

storytelling nomad

the humble musings of a nomadic writer

Charles Gray's blog of writing

Charles Gray's professional and not so professional writings

%d bloggers like this: